The Definitions
Negatively geared: Annual rental income < total deductible expenses. Net loss deducted from other income, reducing your tax bill. You're subsidising the property — hoping capital growth compensates over time.
Positively geared: Annual rental income > total deductible expenses. Net profit added to your taxable income. You receive cash flow each week — but pay more tax.
Neutrally geared: Rental income ≈ total expenses. No net loss or profit for tax purposes.
Negative Gearing: Worked Example
Purchase price: $800,000 | Loan: $640,000 at 6.4% (IO) | Rent: $650/wk = $33,800/year
Annual expenses:
Interest: $40,960
Rates + insurance + management: $6,500
Depreciation: $4,200
Total expenses: $51,660
Net rental loss: $17,860
Tax saving (at 37% marginal rate): $6,608
Out-of-pocket cost after tax: $11,252/year ($216/week)
This investor is paying $216/week to hold the property, betting on capital growth of $50,000–$80,000/year.
Positive Gearing: Worked Example
Purchase price: $550,000 | Loan: $440,000 at 6.4% (IO) | Rent: $550/wk = $28,600/year
Annual expenses:
Interest: $28,160
Rates + insurance + management: $5,000
Depreciation: $2,500
Total expenses: $35,660
Net rental loss: $7,060 (still slightly negative after depreciation)
Note: Without depreciation, this property would be cash-flow positive. Gross cash flow: +$440/year before depreciation.
SW Sydney: Positive vs Negative Gearing by Area
| Suburb | Typical Yield | Likely Gearing | Capital Growth Potential |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbelltown | 5.5–7% | Neutral to positive | Medium |
| Liverpool | 4.5–5.5% | Neutral to negative | Medium-high |
| Parramatta | 3.5–4.5% | Negative | High |
| Oran Park / Leppington | 4–5% | Neutral to negative | Medium (new estates) |
| Lakemba / Bankstown | 4.5–5.5% | Neutral | Medium-high |
| Macquarie Fields / Ingleburn | 5.5–7% | Positive to neutral | Low-medium |
How Each Affects Borrowing Power
| Factor | Negative Gearing | Positive Gearing |
|---|---|---|
| Rental income counted | Yes (shaded 70–80%) | Yes (shaded 70–80%) |
| Loan repayment as expense | Yes (reduces capacity) | Yes (reduces capacity) |
| Net effect on borrowing capacity | Usually reduces | Neutral to small increase (if yield high) |
| Tax deduction factored in? | Some lenders; not all | N/A (taxable income addition) |
Policy Risk
Negative gearing has been politically contentious in Australia. Labor has previously proposed restricting negative gearing to new properties only. As of 2026, there are no restrictions — negative gearing applies to all investment properties. However, investors should assess their strategy on fundamentals (yield + capital growth) rather than relying purely on the tax deduction.
Long-Term Wealth: Which Strategy Wins?
Neither strategy is universally better — it depends on your situation:
| Investor Type | Better Strategy | Why |
|---|---|---|
| High income earner (37%+ tax rate) | Negative gearing | Tax deduction worth more; can absorb weekly shortfall |
| Lower income / early career | Positive gearing | Can't afford weekly subsidy; needs cash flow |
| Already have multiple negatively geared properties | Add positive gearing | Balance cash flow; reduce total subsidy burden |
| Approaching retirement (reduced income) | Positive gearing / neutral | Lower income means less benefit from deductions |
| Building a portfolio quickly | Depends on equity | Positive cash flow preserves borrowing capacity for next purchase |
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to Know How Much You Can Borrow for an Investment?
We'll model your borrowing capacity, calculate the gearing position, and match you to lenders who understand investment property lending.
Call 0432 634 648